Demonstration assessment. Every figure below is an owner-input or planning assumption, shown to illustrate the service, not a validated market finding.
Tarakaturu, Krishna district — demonstration
Tarakaturu, Krishna district — demonstration: use options and financial models
6 of the 10 options have a recorded model. At the 12% hurdle, none of them clears the ₹1.80 Cr a clean sale would fetch today; Sell as-is comes to ₹1.80 Cr. 3 options are still without the capital and income inputs a model needs, so they are not compared here.
What the recorded model gives each option
The dashed line is a clean sale today. Options that keep the parcel carry ten years of net income and the land's terminal value; options that sell carry the cash flows the assessment records. Negative bars mean the option is worth less than selling as it stands.
What each option asks for, against what it returns
Awaiting inputs
- Cold storage — Cold-storage build and operating costs are not recorded, so no value is modelled for it.
- Highway retail / service premises — Frontage income is not modelled until access and permitted land use are verified.
- Agriculture / managed farmland — Crop income is not modelled until soil and water are assessed.
Tourism / hospitality is gated out for this parcel: No demonstrated destination or transit draw for this location
Incentives and subsidies
No incentive or subsidy row is recorded for this parcel, so none of it is counted in any figure above. Amounts depend on scheme rules and an eligibility check, so they are recorded per parcel once a source is on file.
What the figures on this page rest on
The discounting rows are this dashboard's own assumptions, not findings about the market. The rest are the parcel's recorded inputs; change one in the workspace and the page moves with it.
| Parameter | Value | Unit | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discount rate | 12 | % per year | Applied to every option on the same basis. |
| Horizon | 10 | years | Year 0 is today; a terminal value is booked in year 10. |
| Land appreciation | 8 | % per year | Sets the terminal value of the options that keep the parcel. |
| Tax | Not modelled | — | Figures are pre-tax, matching the scenarios the workspace records. |
| JV owner share | 40 | % of gross realisation | A JV split is negotiated per developer; this is a planning assumption. |
| JV absorption | 4 | years | The owner's share is received evenly across the first four years. |
| Parcel area | 1.80 | acres | As entered by the owner in the property workspace. |
| Land value | 1.80 | ₹ Cr | Owner estimate. Also the sell-as-is proceeds and the hurdle every option must clear. |
| Plot price | 10,000 | ₹ per sq. yd. | Planning assumption recorded for the plotting options. |
| Saleable area | 60 | % of extent | Planning assumption recorded for the plotting options. |
| Plotting development cost | 1.10 | ₹ Cr | Recorded for the base case; the downside and upside cases differ. |
Demand is marked unverified for every use on this page. These models price what the options could be worth if the demand is there; they do not establish that it is.